Articles

ByteDance Forced to Pause Seedance 2.0 Global Launch as Hollywood Sparks AI Copyright Clash

字节突然因好莱坞“叫停”：Seedanc2.0全球发布暂停，一场正在爆发的AI版权战争 ？

 

ByteDance abruptly halted the global launch of its AI text‑to‑video model Seedance 2.0 after major Hollywood studios and streaming platforms issued legal warnings over suspected use of unlicensed film and TV material in model training. The incident highlights growing tension over who owns the data used to train advanced AI systems. Hollywood’s concern centers on AI models potentially learning from copyrighted movies, series, visual effects, and character likenesses without permission. Even legally trained models may still generate outputs resembling existing IP, raising unresolved global copyright questions. The Seedance dispute underscores intensifying competition among leading AI video players such as OpenAI, Google, Runway, and ByteDance, while revealing that content data—not traffic—is becoming the most valuable resource in the AI era. As the conflict escalates across media industries, a future of deeper integration appears likely, where film studios provide IP and AI handles production. AI video may democratize filmmaking, elevate IP value, and create new AI‑native content platforms.

 

字节突然叫停Seedance 2.0的全球发布，引发行业关注。好莱坞指控其在训练中可能使用未授权影视内容，引出AI训练数据的版权争议。即使训练合法，生成内容仍可能与现有IP相似，造成侵权风险。事件体现AI视频领域竞争加剧，也凸显内容数据成为核心资源。随着版权冲突扩散至媒体、音乐和影视行业，未来或将出现影视IP与AI制作深度结合的新模式。AI视频可能推动个人化创作、提升IP价值，并催生AI原生内容平台。

 

Source: 数据法盟

 

 

 

 

China’s National Data Administration Issues Policy Briefs Defining China’s Data Property Rights Structure

国家数据局发布系列数据产权政策解读文章

 

National Data Administration published a new series of policy interpretations to explain China’s latest framework for defining data property rights and clarifies how ownership, usage, and operational rights can be separated to match the multi‑party nature of data. Data holders control lawful possession and storage, users process and analyze data, and operators provide data externally through transfers or licensing. These rights can be independently assigned, shared by multiple parties, or held simultaneously by different stakeholders without conflict, enabling broader data reuse. Such separation helps clarify responsibilities, reduce disputes, support efficient data circulation, and stimulate innovation. In practical scenarios, data processors are those who collect, manage, and utilize data, while data subjects are individuals or entities whose activities generate the data. Processors generally hold full data rights for data they legally gather, while data subjects may obtain related data through contractual authorization. This structure aims to balance interests, protect privacy, and encourage both value creation and fair access.

 

国家数据局从3月14日开始发布的系列解读文件阐明了中国最新的数据产权制度，明确了数据持有、使用和经营权的功能划分，以适应数据多主体共生的特点。持有权涉及合法存储，使用权涉及加工分析，经营权涉及对外提供数据，这些权利可以独立配置或由多方共同享有，从而促进数据复用和增值。此制度有助于明确责任、减少争议、推动数据流通并激发创新。在实践中，数据处理者负责采集和利用数据，信息主体则是数据来源者。处理者一般享有其依法收集数据的全部权利，而信息主体可通过合同获得相关数据，实现价值开发与隐私保护之间的平衡。

 

Source: 清华大学智能法治研究院

 

 

 

Our Contact

Thomas Kho

Consultant

Email: thomas.kho@cfnlaw.com.hk

Tel：+852 3468 6494